Breaking News

LSU Baseball – Live on the LSU Sports Radio Network The US House advanced a package of 95 billion Ukraine and Israel to vote on Saturday Will Israel’s Attack Deter Iran? The United States agrees to withdraw American troops from Niger Olympic organizers unveiled a strategy for using artificial intelligence in sports St. John’s Student athletes share sports day with students with special needs 2024 NHL Playoffs bracket: Stanley Cup Playoffs schedule, standings, games, TV channels, time The Stick-Wielding Beast of College Sports Awakens: Johns Hopkins Lacrosse Is Back Joe Pellegrino, a popular television sports presenter, has died at the age of 89 The highest-earning athletes in seven professional sports

It’s 1am on the west coast of America, but the Emerald Cloud Lab, south of San Francisco, is still busy. Here, more than 100 pieces of high-tech scientific equipment are running on mostly unmanned workstations, 24 hours a day and seven days a week, for researchers from around the world. whole. I’m being “visited” by the camera on the chest-high telepresence robot, which is around the 1,400 sq meter (15,000 sq ft) laboratory by Emerald’s CEO, Brian Frezza, who also lives in the house There are no real scientists anywhere, just a few workers in blue coats quietly following instructions from the screens on their cars, making sure the equipment is filled with reagents and samples.

Cloud labs mean that anyone, anything can run experiments remotely, using nothing. more than their website. The models are programmed via a subscription-based internet connection – then coordinated by software robots and automated scientific instruments. to perform the test and process the data. Friday night is Emerald’s busiest time of the week, as scientists schedule experiments to run while they relax with their families over the weekend.

There are still some things that robots cannot do, for example lifting large vehicles (containers for water) or opening samples to be sent in the mail, and there are a few instruments that cannot automatically. This is why the people in blue clothes look like pickers in an Amazon warehouse. It turns out that they are, in fact, many former Amazon employees.

Emerald initially employed scientists and laboratory technicians to help the facility run smoothly, but they were overwhelmed by many things to do. Amazon’s employee procurement has become an improvement. “We pay them double what they get on Amazon to do something more satisfying than stuffing toilet paper into boxes,” Frezza said. “You’re keeping someone’s research in the field of genetic medicine at full speed.”

In the south in the San Francisco Bay Area there are two other cloud centers, managed by the company Strateos. Signs of glittering live scientific instruments – incubators, mixers, mass spectrometers, PCR machines – sit humming in large Perspex boxes known as work cells. The set is definitely more futuristic than Emerald. Here, objects and samples are transported directly to the workroom on high-tech magnetic belts and gently attached to in reserved hands. The models of the researchers are “dismissed”, as given by the director general of the activity of Strateos, Marc Siladi.

Automation in science is nothing new, especially in fields like molecular biology, where much of the work involves laborious and constant transfer of small particles. of water from one bottle to another. The emergency caused by the disease forced many specialized houses to develop ways to operate their devices remotely. (The beams of the powerful British Energy, for example, a machine that accelerates the creation of great power to research subjects, can now be used by users from anywhere in the world.) And outsourcing difficult or time spent elements of the practice is not new.

But Emerald and Strateos are different – they are the first labs in the world that theoretically allow anyone with a laptop and a credit card to “pay and play” with the full analysis of the reagent and the set of instruments available in a world research center. The appeal of this approach was evident during the pandemic, when many researchers could not visit their own laboratories; The founders of cloud labs say that this is the future of life science.

The most obvious benefit is productivity: researchers can run multiple tests at once and set them up to run overnight or while they do other things. “Our users, they do the work of 10 scientists in a typical lab,” Frezza said. “They’re going to do some crazy numbers.”

No time is spent setting up and breaking down equipment, cleaning, maintaining and installing equipment or restocking supplies. Arctoris, a remote pharmaceutical research firm in Oxfordshire, says its platform has completed jobs for pharmaceutical companies in 24 hours that could take as little as and a week in a tradition. Instead of piping for hours each day, researchers can spend more time thinking, reading, and analyzing results with their colleagues.

Scientists at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh were very impressed with what staff and students could do in the Emerald Cloud Lab – one researcher was able to turn back the years of his PhD project in a few weeks – they recently asked the company to build another one, only. for them.

With a year’s worth of access to a cloud lab it’s often cheaper than the cost of a single piece of top-of-the-line equipment, says the dean of Carnegie Mellon’s College of Science, Rebecca Doerge, the image can change. “I’m not interested in just changing science at Carnegie Mellon. I’m interested in changing the process of science around the world,” he said of the new building in Pittsburgh. All of our partners in places that lack education can’t do the science they can because they don’t have enough money. With an internet connection and access to a lab. Cloud computing is a game changer.”

Doerge, a certified researcher turned management scientist, is also interested in eliminating variation and human error from design projects. There will be no scientists based in the new 1,500 sq meter (16,000 sq ft) facility, only half a dozen engineering assistants on site to run 24 hours a day. “People keep going to wet houses and they just stand there and they make mistakes. I don’t think everything is automatic in science, I’m not saying that. I’m just saying it’s repetitive, once you learn it, you don’t have to stand there and do it over and over again.”

Scientists like Doerge believe that the precision of remote sensing can help alleviate what is known as science’s “reproducibility problem” — the worry that the results of published studies cannot be replicated. when followed by different groups of the same scientists. right way. Adding a template to a search performed by robots encourages searchers to translate the correct information. each step is clearly marked. For example, what was previously described in a scientific paper as “mixing of samples” becomes a detailed computer description for a machine that mixes in a number of changes per minute for a certain time. Other factors that may affect the outcome, such as the ambient temperature at the time, are captured in metadata.

As Doerge encouraged more and more research – and even teaching – at Carnegie Mellon to move to remote laboratories, not all of his colleagues were supportive. Many scientists think that working together with their friends in the chair with the sights and sounds of the experiments are the things that help to stimulate interesting ideas and interesting problems. Others have concerns about the quality of the data being produced in labs they have never been to. students,” Doerge said. “It’s definitely a mindset shift.”

Some experts believe that facilitating access to specialized laboratories may pose a threat to biosecurity or bioterrorism. In theory, small groups or individuals without research can use a cloud lab to start doing research. biomedical research. “The laboratory says that they work with reliable partners, but in fact they are very willing to open their markets,” said Dr Filippa Lentzos, an expert on harmful organisms and biosecurity at King’s College London. “Although we have to remember that most people come from a good place, there are also crazy people out there. Barriers will definitely come down if you want to do it with heart. there is something bad.

Cloud labs says they review all proposed surveys and have procedures in place to flag or reject anything that appears illegal or dangerous. In addition, they argue, the full use of everything that happens in the laboratory makes it easier to record and monitor what people are doing than in a typical laboratory.

Paul Freemont, the founder of the UK Innovation and Knowledge Center for Synthetic Biology, helped develop several laboratories in the UK, including a robotic platform that was able to perform more than 1,000 Covid tests per day at the beginning of the disease. He’s not sure that remote labs are “big enough” to test what’s available to scientists setting up their own robotics. “I like the idea and the idea that this is the way science will go. It would be useful if we had all the instructions and workflows that a biologist needs, but I don’t think it’s available. now in the level of complexity and detail one needs.

Freemont also has concerns about scientists who don’t really understand or participate in the program or the tools that generate their data. “You have to have the next generation of scientists to understand the construction of all these infrastructures and how to work on them – you have to have experience, for sure. The opportunity for a few laboratories or large private companies to deal with that understanding – I don’t think it’s going to be very healthy.”

Despite these concerns, there is a growing interest in science. Emerald is expanding capacity to meet demand, mostly from pharmaceutical companies and biotech startups. Strateos is working with the US research agency Darpa to study in detail how its buildings can improve the recovery and efficiency of previous models and the company is also licensing its software so that other organizations can translate a their house.

In the future, cloud labs can choose what tests they do. As recently proven by Google’s DeepMind platform, machine learning tools can now crunch through decades of data and provide answers to questions it takes years for scientists to complete physical studies. Pharmaceutical companies are increasingly using these tools to test molecular interactions in their search for new drugs. Data from cloud labs – which turn biology into a data source – are just more powerful tools. The integration of all these technologies can lead one day to systems that can develop training and physically test them without the use of humans.

Currently, some users of the Emerald Cloud Lab have developed algorithms to adjust the parameters or the order of the next test based on their own data analysis. “It’s kind of a bad thing, it’s very futuristic,” Frezza said.

This means that scientists are the latest profession to ask what the move towards automation and AI means for the future. Can many ordinary research scientists one day be out of a job? It seems impossible – after all, we always need people to prioritize the questions that need to be answered and develop new ways to answer them. But the days of sitting in a long chair in a white coat and gloves next to the Bunsen flame may soon be a thing of the past – the era of the robot researcher has arrived.

What are the 4 types of operating system?

What are the types of an Operating System? To see also : Teen Science Prodigy Great Designer Biotech Lab Tools.

  • Program Operations. …
  • Time-Sharing Operating Systems. …
  • Shared Operations. …
  • Embedded Operating System. …
  • Real-time Operating System.

What are the 5 operating systems? For the most part, the major IT industry focuses on five OSs, including Apple macOS, Microsoft Windows, Google’s Android OS, Linux Operating System, and Apple iOS.

What are the 3 main operating systems?

There are many operating systems available but the three most common operating systems are Microsoft’s Windows, Apple’s macOS and Linux.

To see also :
The test of a new team-based way of treating bipolar disorder was…

Is robotics a branch of science?

Robotics is a branch of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering and computer science that deals with the design, construction, operation, and use of robots, as well as computer systems for their control, sensing, and information processing. To see also : Children receive colorful lessons at the Imagine That science camp.

Is Robotics considered a science? Robotics is a specialized field of science and engineering that specializes in the design, construction and operation of mechanical devices.

Is robotics a science or engineering?

Robotics is an interdisciplinary branch of computer science and engineering. On the same subject : The ancient galaxy’s spin suggests the universe’s earliest stars rapidly coalesced into disks. Robotics involves the design, construction, operation, and operation of robots.

Is robotic part of computer science?

Robotics draws on many disciplines within computer science and beyond, from mathematics to mechanics to biology. Special tools from computer science include artificial intelligence, modeling physics, and artificial intelligence (e.g., computer vision).

This may interest you :
Dr. Alan Lightman has been around the block a couple of times.…

Will biotechnology be automated?

Basically, the biotechnology sector is like any other sector: as far as possible, production processes are automated to produce successful products as quickly as possible, in large quantities and at low cost.

Does biotechnology include robotics? Biotechnology applications are among the fastest growing areas of robotics. Drug and vaccine research has moved automation from the factory to the lab and research and development. Department of biotechnology companies.

Can biology be automated?

Biologists and scientists combined predicted a 15.6% chance of switching to the machine. Although the report considers this to be a low level, it is higher than the manager, artists, and teachers, there is a smaller than 5% chance to change to the machine.

Why Is biotechnology the future?

Biotechnology is also revolutionizing the study of diseases caused by genetic factors. New tests can detect changes in the DNA sequence of genes associated with disease and can predict the development of a sick.

NASA's Science Leadership will hold a Town Hall Meeting
Read also :
What are future space technologies? Future space technologies will rely heavily on…

Is AI or robotics better?

The difference that AI shows is the ability to make decisions. The program can produce better results, that is, improvisation. AI is the technological brain and wiring and programming. Robots require prior instructions or instructions to operate autonomously or semi-autonomously.

WHO is the future of robotics? However, recent developments in machine learning and artificial intelligence mean that we may see an increase in human-to-robot interactions in the future. The robotics industry is expected to grow exponentially in the coming years. Estimates suggest that the total cost could reach $260 billion by 2030.

Is AI good for robotics?

Robots can benefit from AI and machine learning in a variety of ways, and these things that can use AI include: Computer vision. AI and computer vision technology can help robots recognize and recognize what they encounter, help pick out information on objects and aid in navigation and avoidance.

What is better robotics or artificial intelligence?

AI robots can be better described as intelligent automation applications where robotics provide the body while AI provides the brain. Industrial automation, AI and robotics also include other technologies such as computer vision and NLP.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *