Breaking News

The likelihood of a 2023 recession in the United States and Europe continues to rise Kevin Ritz Sworn in as United States Attorney The richest people in the United States (September 28, 2022) New infectious threats are coming. Perhaps the United States is not limited to them. The United States to open 100,000 visa appointment slots, resume student visa interviews in November How the United States Exports Inflation to Other Countries The United States Should Boost Its Strategy in Latin America, Starting with Chile United States Congratulations to São Tomé and Príncipe on Elections – United States Department of State The United States invests $288.6 million in new foreign military funding for Poland FACT SHEET: Roadmap for a US-Pacific Islands partnership in the 21st century

The COVID-19 pandemic has shed light on the disproportionate burden that certain diseases and conditions – such as diabetes, metabolic syndrome and mental disorders – place on historically excluded, marginalized communities. It has also drawn attention to the negative effects of implicit prejudice and the social construct of race.

The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Maximizing Access Committee symposiums at Discover BMB in Seattle in March will examine the impact of implicit bias on science at the genomic level, including experimental design and data interpretation, and how they contribute to health differences. This topic is of particular importance given the emerging use of genetics in the development of artificial intelligence mechanisms.

We need to put things right and reduce health inequalities. That means asking difficult questions, including of ourselves as scientists. We need to examine how our implicit biases distort our lens as biomedical researchers. We need to rethink our scientific past to better understand our present and thus prepare for our future.

Key words: genetics, race, implicit bias, data interpretation, health differences, artificial intelligence.

Theme Song: “Free Your Mind” by En Vogue is a song that addresses everyday stereotypes, implicit prejudices and micro-aggressions that historically excluded, marginalized people face. If only those who make such judgments would clear their minds, peace would follow for all of us.

This session is driven by our need as scientists to be aware of our implicit biases—and the potential role they play in our research questions, experimental designs, and data analysis—so that we can mitigate them, and thus health disparities.

Speakers

Race as a Human Construct: We Are Only Human, Not RaceKayunta Johnson–Winters (Chairperson), University of Texas at ArlingtonAmanda Bryant–Friedrich, Wayne State UniversityChris Gignoux, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusDaniel Dawes, Morehouse School of Medicine Satcher Health Leadership InstituteAllison C Augustus–Wallace, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans To see also : Co-lead mental health clinician joins Shrewsbury Police.

How Selection Bias and Data Interpretation Contribute to Differences in Health Outcomes and Artificial Intelligence DevelopmentSonia Flores (Chair), University of Colorado DenverIrene Dankwa–Mullan, IBM Watson HealthLucio Miele, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New OrleansRobert Maupin, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New OrleansRosalina Bray, National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research

On the same subject :
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (WVIR) – Some new laws are officially in place in…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.