“Trust science,” says the media.
Polls show that few Americans do. There is a good reason for that.
“They don’t trust science because science is increasingly unreliable,” says science writer Andrew Follet in my new video. “The only group that trusts science right now are the Democrats.”
Sixty-four percent of Democrats have “a lot” of confidence in the scientific community, compared to 34% of Republicans.
Of course, true science – using the scientific method – is important. But that’s not much of a “science” these days.
Instead, today government science is being misused by progressive politicians.
Example 1: Environmentalists want to limit commercial fishing. They want Congress to pass what they call the “Ocean-Based Climate Solutions Act.” It says that climate change is “the biggest threat to the security of the American world” and offers a strange solution: close most of the ocean to commercial fishing.
The deputy director of Climate, Jane Lubchenco, told Congress that the scientific paper concludes that closing more of the ocean could increase fish catches.
Really? That doesn’t seem logical.
It’s not like that. The paper was revised. One scientist called its reasoning “impossible in living things.”
Also, Lubchenco did not tell Congress that the paper was written by his brother-in-law! And arranged by him!
Did the White House punish Lubchenco for violating his ethics? Nope. In fact, after his testimony, he was appointed a member of President Joe Biden’s Scientific Integrity Task Force!
Last week, the National Academy of Sciences banned him for five years. However, he is still on the White House’s Scientific Integrity Task Force.
Unfortunately, most of what is called science today is just left-wing propaganda.
“New fields like oil studies, Africana studies, Latinx studies, serious studies,” says Follet, “are fake.”
Fake? Well, they should be. “Experts” in those cases are constantly deceived by lying people.
Example 2: The mock paper, “Embracing Obesity as Self-Care in the Age of Trump,” was accepted by Massey University’s “Fat Studies” conference. The conference then invited the paper’s author, “Sea Matheson,” to speak.
Attendees gave Matheson a warm welcome, praising the paper’s explanation of Donald Trump’s “fatphobia” and inviting Matheson to review another work submitted to his “science” journal, Fat Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society.
But Matheson is not a scientist. “He” is the comedian Steven Crowder, who disguised himself as a fat woman to expose “ivory quackery.”
Crowder is the latest person to deceive the so-called scientific journals of today. James Lindsay, Peter Boghossian and Helen Pluckrose submitted null papers to “complaint studies” journals such as Fat Studies, Sexuality & Culture and Sex Work.
Seven received blank papers.
One that took part of “Mein Kampf” but replaced the text of “National Socialism” with “feminism,” was accepted by Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work.
Gender, Place and Culture hosted a paper on rape practices at dog parks.
Follett blames the government for this distortion of science. Its scientific institutions, like most of America, have been taken over by leftists who are hungry to promote themselves and their agenda.
In science, the way to promote yourself is to get papers published. This usually leads to more money. Government organizations like the National Science Foundation provide much of that money.
“No one wants to publish something that goes against the payer,” says Follett. “You don’t get published unless NSF likes your findings.”
Example 3: NSF awarded half a million dollars to a team that wrote a paper questioning ice science because it “is based on man-made information.”
Vanities are driven by entitlement, too. Some people still say that humans do not play a role in climate change or that the climate is not warming at all. Some say that vaccines don’t work. But right science is not funded by the government.
I am angry that my tax dollars go to support such nonsense.
Unfortunately, most Americans don’t care. Maybe it’s because they don’t know that the government throws so much money into progressive entertainment.
“We’re all going to start caring when bridges start collapsing and planes start crashing,” says Follet. “That’s the inevitable result of this.”
John Stossel is the producer of Stossel TV and the author of “Give Me a Break: How I Overcame Hucksters, Cheats, and Scam Artists and Became the Plague of the Liberal Media.” For other Creator Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.
News coming out today and more in the inbox menu
What is scientific integrity in psychology?
The Psychology of Scientific Integrity Scientific integrity refers to two concepts that advance the idea of science that must be “getting it right”: 1. Personal integrity and honesty in the implementation and interpretation of scientific research; and 2. This may interest you : Roper publishes editorial on science, public health and politics | Newsroom. To develop a set of valid and unbiased conclusions.
How do you ensure scientific integrity? THE DESTRUCTION OF ANOTHER SAINT
- Intellectual Integrity in Designing, Conducting, and Reporting Research. …
- Accuracy in Representation of Contributions to Research Proposals and Reports. …
- Fairness in Peer Review. …
- Collegiality in Scientific Interactions, Including Discussion and Sharing of Resources.
What is the meaning of scientific integrity?
Scientific integrity is the condition that comes from adherence to professional ethics and procedures in conducting, reporting, and using the results of scientific activities that guarantee accuracy, clarity, and reproducibility, and that provide insulation from bias, lies, fabrications, fabrications, …
What is research integrity in psychology?
Research Integrity means conducting research in a way that allows others to have confidence and trust in the methods and findings of the research. To see also : Boot camp to train for high-tech jobs. It relates to the scientific integrity of the research conducted and the professional integrity of the researchers.
Why is scientific integrity important?
Why is this important? The report argues that research integrity is important because it creates trust, and trust is at the heart of research. This may interest you : Barch Named Associate Dean for Research in Arts and Sciences – The Source. Researchers must trust each other’s work, and “they must also be trusted by the community as they provide scientific expertise that can affect people’s lives”.
What is research integrity in psychology?
Research Integrity means conducting research in a way that allows others to have confidence and trust in the methods and findings of the research. It relates to the scientific integrity of the research conducted and the professional integrity of the researchers.
What is the importance of reliability research? In order for us to maintain that reputation, it is important that everyone involved in conducting research continues to meet the highest accepted standards. Trustworthy research refers to conducting research in a way that allows others to trust and rely on the methods used and the findings derived from these.
What does research integrity mean?
Research integrity includes: the use of reliable and valid methods in planning, conducting, and evaluating research. reporting research results and monitoring compliance with laws, regulations, guidelines, and. compliance with accepted professional codes or standards.
What is scientific honesty in research?
Scientific integrity means you don’t change your data to fit expectations. Honesty. Get help with your research. Join ResearchGate to ask questions, get input, and advance your work.
What is scientific integrity and ethics? Scientific ethics requires honesty and integrity in all stages of the scientific process, from reporting results to communicating well with stakeholders. This ethical system guides the scientific process, from data collection to publication and beyond.
Why is honesty important in scientific research?
As mentioned earlier, credibility plays a major role in information seeking and in promoting cooperation and trust between researchers. Few scientists or experts dispute the importance of credibility and most people understand what it means to fabricate or falsify information related to research.
What does research say about honesty?
The researchers say their results tell us that honesty is the best policy. Our fear of telling others what we really think is lost.
What is the meaning of scientific integrity?
Scientific integrity is the condition that comes from adherence to professional ethics and procedures in conducting, reporting, and using the results of scientific activities that guarantee accuracy, clarity, and reproducibility, and that provide insulation from bias, lies, fabrications, fabrications, …
What are the 2 other areas of scientific dishonesty?
The three main examples of scientific uncertainty in this definition – lies, falsifications and deception – are also used around the world and are often called “FFP”.
What are the different types of scientific misconduct? The most common types of scientific misconduct are plagiarism, falsification and plagiarism, of which the most common of the three is plagiarism. Forgery and plagiarism are less common but have more impact on record research than copying.
How many scientific misconducts are there?
Although not much is known about the prevalence of scientific misconduct, several studies with limited methodology have estimated that the prevalence of scientists involved in scientific misconduct ranges from 1% to 2%.
What could be considered scientific dishonesty?
Scientific dishonesty usually refers to actions or omissions related to research, which lead to false or distorted scientific results or provide misleading information about a person’s contribution to research [1â3].
