Breaking News

The US military is ready to secure new access to key bases in the Philippines New report finds US spends the most on health care but has the worst health outcomes among high-income countries The U.S. will end its COVID-19 emergency declaration on May 11 What the end of COVID-19 emergencies means in the United States Former Brazilian president, Jair Bolsonaro, requests a six-month tourist visa to the United States Bolsonaro, Brazil’s former president, has applied for a tourist visa to the US Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro applied for a US visa Europe Doesn’t Need The United States Anymore The US has said that Russia is violating the nuclear arms control agreement Oil rises as US recession fears ease and dollar falls

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to date on Texas ’most essential news.

WASHINGTON – U.S. Sen. John Cornyn was able to pass important gun legislation in the Senate on Thursday, an achievement that came just weeks after 19 children and two teachers were killed in a school shooting in Uvalde.

Known as the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, Cornyn spent twenty years of political capital to move the bill, in what was an almost inconceivable step for a Republican who represents a state that often proudly announces that it has the most fire and some of the loosest weapon restrictions. .

Cornyn, the main sponsor of the bill, worked closely with Republican and Senate colleagues who garnered enough votes from his own party in the Senate to defeat a filibuster threat with some breathing space.

“While the discussion on this subject causes great emotions, and I understand why,” Cornyn said in a speech on the ground before the vote, “for too long, some politicians have tried to establish the right to live in a secure community against the constitutional right to hold and bear arms. It seems that our country can only have one or the other. “

In a final vote, the bill passed the Senate 65-33. The Senate gave an initial passage to the bill Tuesday. He goes near the House, where he is expected to pass easily. President Joe Biden has indicated that he will sign it as law.

The bill is widely seen as a series of modest changes to current gun regulations, which fall far short of the proposals pushed by House and Biden Democrats to raise the age to buy. gun, ban weapons of attack and expand universal background controls. However, the bill at the same time is poised to be the most significant achievement of Congress ’arms policy in a generation.

One Republican who voted against the bill, however, was Cornyn’s colleague in Texas, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz.

Cruz went to the floor announcing his own proposals on gun safety dating back several years, many of which focused on securing schools.

Cruz said the handgun bill would “remove the constitutional rights of Americans.”

“I think the chances of this bill doing anything significant, to actually prevent the next mass murder are very low,” he said. “This bill is not designed to do. This bill is designed, among other things, to strike the urge to ‘do something’.”

“After each of these [mass shootings], the call comes out to ‘do something,'” he added. “I agree, do something, but do something that works. Something to stop these crimes.

Almost exactly two hours later, Cornyn made her final speech in favor of the bill. He said politicians presented a “false choice” between public safety and the right to bear arms.

“After the shooting he promised to do everything I could to try to answer that call,” he said, while holding air quotes while adding, “To do something.”

“I don’t believe we do anything in the face of what we’ve seen in Uvalde, and we’ve seen in a lot of communities,” he continued. “Doing nothing is an abdication of our responsibility as representatives of the American people here in the United States Senate,” he added, adding that he does not support any provision that violates the rights of owners. law-abiding weapons. “

The most noteworthy provision of the draft note closes what is known as “the boyfriend’s loophole.” Current federal statutes prohibit the purchase of firearms for those convicted of domestic violence against a spouse or cohabiting partner.

To close the gap, the Senate bill will leave it to the courts to outline the expansion of how to define and include dating partners who commit such abuse. Conservatives have previously raised concerns that an expansive definition of a partner could threaten constitutional rights. The new bill will also allow offenders to regain their gun rights if there are no more five-year offenses.

Another conservative objection involved a program of incentives to encourage states to adopt red flag laws, which would prevent individuals who are deemed dangerous from acquiring weapons. In the final language, grants will go not only to the implementation of red flag laws but also to the courts dealing with drug cases or cases involving veterans.

The bill also includes a 10-day window to allow local officials to search databases for disqualification information on arms buyers for the first time under the age of 21.

The margin of support from GOP senators is noteworthy as it exceeded the 60 votes needed to defeat the filibuster. But it also means that no Republican senator can be categorized as the “casting vote” in advertising the upcoming political campaign, which would have been the case if Cornyn had won the support of only 10 Republicans.

But 65 votes is less than Cornyn’s support for his other weapons legislation, known as “Fix NICS,” which had the support of 77 senators before passing in 2018. That measure, which Cornyn attached to a massive spending bill, closed gaps and improved the national conduct control system.

On Wednesday, Cruz introduced his own bill, which included nearly $ 28 billion in funding for improved school safety and mental health services. He introduced the bill to U.S. Sen. John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican, who is widely seen as a potential rival to Cornyn in a future leadership race.

Join us September 22-24 in person in downtown Austin for The Texas Tribune Festival and experience a 100+ conversation event featuring big names you know and others you have from the worlds of politics, public policy, media and technology – all curated by The Texas Tribune’s winning journalists. Buy tickets.

Can a convicted felon own a gun after 10 years in New Mexico?

Firearms. It is illegal for a person convicted of an offense to receive, transport or possess a firearm or destructive device for ten years after the completion of the sentence, including probation. See N.M.Stat.

Can a criminal buy a firearm in New Mexico? Convicted criminals cannot carry weapons If convicted of a crime, the state of New Mexico prohibits you from carrying, possessing, selling or possessing any firearm. Read also : China launches high-tech aircraft carrier at naval milestone. If you have been pardoned or the court has issued a deferred sentence, or if ten years have elapsed since the sentence was handed down, then the law does not apply.

What disqualifies you from buying a gun in New Mexico?

The department shall deny a concealed handgun license to an applicant who has received conditional release, diversion or deferral or has been convicted of, pleaded guilty or has entered a plea of ​​nolo contendere for a misdemeanor involving an offense of violence within the a period of ten years before the …

When can a felon be around a gun?

In general, criminals are still allowed to associate with or be around someone who has a gun. However, things can get difficult if the gun is around or if the person lives with them. This may interest you : After COVID, South Korean youth investors exchanged professional shares. There are some cases where a convicted felon can be found guilty of “constructive possession” of a firearm.

Can a felon bow hunt in New Mexico?

It is illegal for criminals to have a firearm in all states in the United States. On the same subject : The Texas GOP has adopted a resolution rejecting the 2020 election results. Any applicant who is a felon under New Mexico Law should be restricted from using “Archery Equipment ONLY” if he or she succeeds in withdrawing “any legal sports license” or “muzzleloader”.

This may interest you :
SEOUL, South Korea – The United States flew nuclear-capable bombers and stealth…

Does South Carolina have background checks for guns?

Criminals, domestic abusers, and others barred from firearms try to buy them regularly in South Carolina — and are stopped for background checks. Since 1998, a total of more than 79,000 sales to banned buyers have been denied in South Carolina.

Does South Carolina need a fire license? South Carolina is a state-owned firearms permit issued by the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). There is no permit, background check or firearms registration required when purchasing a handgun from a private individual.

Does South Carolina require a background check to buy a gun?

Federal law requires that federally licensed firearms dealers (but not unlicensed sellers) begin a background check on the buyer prior to the sale of the firearm.

Can I carry a loaded gun in my car South Carolina?

The pistol can be loaded or unloaded as long as it is secured in the glove compartment or console. You can also carry it in another container â € œclosed fitted with an integral drawstring and transported in the luggage compartment of the vehicle.â €

On the same subject :
Seoul, South Korea CNN —North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is calling…

Is the NFA constitutional?

The Supreme Court overturned the District Court and ruled that the NFA provision (criminalizing possession of certain firearms) was not in violation of the Second Amendment restriction and was therefore constitutional.

What happens if you break the NFA? Any violation of the NFA is a punishable offense with a fine of up to $ 250,000 and up to 10 years in prison, and any firearm involved will be forfeited. Of the NFA firearms (silencers, machine guns, short barrel guns, short barrel shotguns, any other weapon (AOW) and destructive devices) machineguns are the most restricted.

Is the NFA a federal law?

The National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) requires the registration with the federal government of fully automatic firearms (called “machine guns”), rifles and shotguns of general length. below 26 inches, rifles with barrel underneath. 16-inch, 18-inch barrel shotguns, and firearm sound suppressors …

Is ATF constitutional?

False: Congress makes federal weapons laws; ATF enforces them. ATF has a national arms registry. False: ATF is strictly prohibited by law from having a national weapons register.

Does the NFA violate the Second Amendment?

Surprisingly, the district court dismissed the charges, ruling that the NFA violates the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court overturned in the United States v. Miller, ruling in the Second Amendment, does not guarantee the right to hold and carry a sawn shotgun as a matter of law.

Response to the Trilateral Meeting of National Security Advisers of the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea
Read also :
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan from the United States met with Secretary…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *