Breaking News

Executive Business Meeting | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary “A real disappointment:” People share overwhelming travel destinations to skip, and the gems you should… Travel tips to survive: A checklist for every vacation US-Italy relationship – “Italy and the United States are strong allies and close friends.” Options | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary US deficit poses ‘significant risks’ to global economy, IMF says America’s debt problems are piling up problems for the rest of the world The US will help Armenia modernize its army A secret Russian foreign policy document calls for action to weaken the US. The United States will again impose sanctions on Venezuela’s oil and gas sector

The US Department of State has selected seven distinguished scientists to serve as US Science Officers in January 2023: Dr. Drew Harvell, Dr. Jessica Gephart, Dr. Christine Kreuder Johnson, Dr. LaShanda Korley, Dr. Prineha Narang, Mrs. Frances Seymour, and Dr. Kyle Whyte. Through the Science Envoy program, outstanding U.S. scientists and engineers use their expertise and networks to forge connections and identify opportunities for sustainable international collaboration to advance solutions to common challenges, drive innovation and enhance America’s scientific leadership and technical to demonstrate ingenuity.

Like their 23 predecessors, these distinguished scientists are recognized by the Secretary of State. They travel as private individuals in order to exchange ideas internationally with civil society and with government interlocutors. Science Envoys help inform the State Department, other U.S. government agencies, and the scientific community about opportunities for science and technology collaboration. The 2023 Cohort was selected for their expertise in key issues facing the world today and will focus on these priority areas during their service, including: marine conservation and marine protected areas; Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing; A health and zoonotic diseases; plastic pollution; quantum information science and technology; Nature-based solutions to climate change; and the nexus of environmental sciences and indigenous knowledge.

Drew Harvell is Professor Emeritus at Cornell University, Affiliate Faculty University of Washington, and a Fellow of the Ecological Society of America. dr Harvell’s research into ocean sustainability has taken her from the coral reefs of the Caribbean and Pacific to the frigid waters of the Pacific Northwest. Her current research focuses on the health of top predators and seagrass beds in the transboundary waters of the Salish Sea. Her latest book, Ocean Outbreak, describes oceanic infection epidemics and solutions that benefit people and biodiversity. Her awards include the Cornell SUNY Chancellors Award for Excellence, the Ecological Society of America Sustainability Award, the Seattle Aquarium Conservation Award, the Prose Award (Ocean Outbreak), and the National Outdoor Book Award (A Sea of ​​Glass).

Jessica Gephart is an Assistant Professor of Environmental Sciences at American University. dr Gephart received her Ph.D. in Environmental Sciences from the University of Virginia and completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center. Her research focuses on the interface between seafood globalization and environmental change, assessing how the seafood trade causes distant environmental impacts and how environmental shocks disrupt the seafood trade. Her work brings together global trade data, local consumption data and environmental impact data to understand the opportunities and risks of seafood globalization for sustainable production and food security.

Christine Kreuder Johnson is Professor of Epidemiology and Ecosystem Health and Director of the EpiCenter for Disease Dynamics at the University of California, Davis, School of Veterinary Medicine. Her work is committed to transdisciplinary research to characterize the impact of environmental change on human and animal health and to guide public policy to mitigate pandemic threats. She was elected to the National Academy of Medicine for pioneering approaches to monitoring emerging diseases at the animal-human interface and studying environmental and climate-related drivers of viral transmission. She is also an honorary member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

LaShanda Korley is Distinguished Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware and is a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS), the American Chemical Society Division of Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering (ACS PMSE), and the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE). She is also director of an Energy Frontier Research Center — the Center for Plastics Innovation (CPI) — funded by the Department of Energy. Korley is a global leader in applying bio-inspired and sustainable principles to the molecular design, manufacture and exploitation of functional polymer systems.

Prineha Narang is a Professor and Howard Reiss Chair in Physical Sciences at UCLA, where she leads an interdisciplinary group on quantum science and technology. Before joining UCLA, she was an assistant professor of computational materials science at Harvard University. Before joining the Harvard faculty, Dr. Narang Environmental Fellow at Harvard and worked as a research scientist in condensed matter theory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). She received an M.S. and Ph.D. in Applied Physics from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). Narang’s work has received many awards, including the APS Maria Goeppert Mayer Prize and the Mildred Dresselhaus Prize.

Frances Seymour is an expert on tropical forests and climate change. She is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at the World Resources Institute, Chair of the Board of the Architecture for REDD+ Transactions, and lead author of Why Forests? Why now? The Science, Economics and Politics of Tropical Forests and Climate Change. Seymour has lived and worked in Indonesia for 11 years, including six years as Director General of the Center for International Forest Research (CIFOR), for which she was awarded the French Order of Merit for Agriculture. She has an M.P.A. from Princeton University and a B.S. from UNC-Chapel Hill.

Kyle Whyte is Professor of Environmental Justice in the University of Michigan’s School for Environment and Sustainability. He is Founding Faculty Director of the Tishman Center for Social Justice and the Environment and Principal Investigator of the Energy Equity Project. dr Whyte is a member of the White House Advisory Panel on Environmental Justice and the lead chapter author for the Tribes and Indigenous Peoples chapter of the US National Climate Assessment. His research focuses on the rights and knowledge of indigenous peoples in the areas of climate change and conservation planning, education and politics. He is an enrolled member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation.

For more information, contact OES-PA-DG@state.gov or follow @SciDiplomacyUSA and #USScienceEnvoy on Twitter.

What are the 3 components of scientific knowledge?

The three central components of scientific and critical thinking This may interest you : USC, UCLA to leave Pac-12 in Big Ten in 2024: University sport begins its last seismic shake.

  • Empiricism: The use of empirical evidence. …
  • Rationalism: The practice of logical thinking. …
  • Skepticism: Possessing a skeptical attitude.

What are the different components of scientific knowledge? The core elements of this scientific activity are articulating hypotheses, laws or models, designing experiments or empirical investigations that test these ideas, collecting data and using data as evidence in order to evaluate and revise them.

What are three scientific components?

There are three main branches of science: physical science, earth science, and life science. Each of the three branches of science has its own career applications.

What are the three characteristics of scientific knowledge?

Systematic Nature of Science We have identified three main characteristics of the scientific method (empirical reference, repeatability, self-correction). Another important feature distinguishes insights gained through the scientific method from those gained through our daily experiences. On the same subject : Power & Politics Full Show: A deep dive into Connecticut’s primary elections.

Connecting diversity in nonprofit entertainment and marketing, funding, location • News Service • Iowa State University
This may interest you :
Empty seats before a performance at C.Y. Stephens Auditorium, Ames, IA, 2022.…

What are the three characteristics of scientific knowledge?

Systematic Nature of Science We have identified three main characteristics of the scientific method (empirical reference, repeatability, self-correction). Another important feature distinguishes insights gained through the scientific method from those gained through our daily experiences. This may interest you : Congress invests in the science and technology of the future.

.

Free science-based children's program on tap at Vandergrift Public Library
To see also :
A free biology-themed program hosted by an educator from the Carnegie Science…

How is scientific knowledge developed?

Knowledge grows by exploring the limits of existing rules and mutually reinforcing evidence. Scientists try to discover rules about relationships or phenomena that exist in nature and ultimately they try to describe, explain and predict.

What is scientific knowledge based on? Scientific knowledge is based on empirical evidence. Science disciplines share common rules of proof that are used to evaluate explanations about natural systems. Science involves the process of coordinating patterns of evidence with current theory.

How scientific knowledge is created?

Scientific knowledge is developed through a process known as the scientific method. Basically, ideas (in the form of theories and hypotheses) are tested against the real world (in the form of empirical observations), and those empirical observations give rise to further ideas that are tested against the real world, and so on.

How does scientific knowledge develop and progress?

Science advances when it develops concepts, typologies, frameworks of understanding, methods, techniques, or data that make it possible to uncover phenomena or test explanations for them. Knowing where and how to look for discoveries and explanations is therefore an important way of scientific advancement.

On the same subject :
What is the characteristics of scientific theory? Scientific theories are testable and…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *